![]() |
![]() |
|
Regional
Inventory
of Potential Accidental Risk Spots in the Tisa catchment area of Romania, Hungary, Ukraine & Slovakia Prepared by the Permanent Secretariat of the ICPDR in cooperation with Zinke Environment Consulting for Central and Eastern Europe, Vienna August 2000 |
Foreword
The government representatives
from Romania, Hungary, Ukraine and Slovakia agreed at a Tetralateral Commission
meeting held in Cluj (RO) on 23-24 May, 2000, to prepare national inventories
of potential pollution sources (including their mapping) within the Tisa catchment
area.
In June, the Permanent
Secretariat of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube
River (ICPDR) in Vienna received the national contributions and made an evaluation
producing the 1st Regional Inventory of Potential Accidental Risk
Spots in the Tisa catchment area of Romania, Hungary, Ukraine & Slovakia,
which was issued in July 2000. The objective was to identify those pollution
sources, which may pose the most important transboundary accidental risks.
In the 1st
Regional Inventory it was indicated that there were still some information
gaps existing concerning a complete picture of the risk spots in the Tisa
catchment area. Upon the request from the Permanent Secretariat additional
information was received from Romania concerning risk spots in the Crisuri
and Mures sub-basins. No additional data were obtained from the other countries.
Based on this available information, the Regional Inventory of Potential Accidental
Risk Spots in the Tisa catchment area of Romania, Hungary, Ukraine & Slovakia
was completed by the Permanent Secretariat of the ICPDR.
This inventory and the
ranking of the risk spots is based on information supplied by the officially
authorised country representatives. This, however, does not indicate that
the inventory does cover all sites, which might be the source of accidental
environmental pollution or, which could pose a risk to waters in the Tisa
catchment area. The completeness of the inventory and the proposed priority
ranking should be reviewed by the Tetralateral Commission and the BMTF to
assure the implementation of effective measures for future prevention of accidental
pollution in the Tisa catchment area.
1. Introduction
Base material
The inventory was prepared
using national criteria for activities with hazardous and polluting substances,
and by arranging them into a prescribed format table (see Annex 3 of the Cluj
Minutes). Priority should have been given to the mining industry. Only Romania
responded adequately to this point, while the other countries have only few
mining activities in this region.
It was further stated
that the AEPWS Expert Group dealing with a "Methodology for Accidental
Risk Inventory" and the Baia Mare Task Force shall prioritise the
most hazardous activities and shall work out recommendations to improve the
safety of installations.
All four countries provided
the requested lists. However, these lists and their details differ in their
completeness of information and volume. Hungary provided over 400 risk spots
where most of them do actually not indicate a significant accidental risk;
therefore the Hungarian list was substantially reduced. Romania provided equally
comprehensive lists of pollution sources, which were not all taken into account
in this inventory but reduced to follow the methodology agreed at the Cluj
meeting. Therefore unofficial information concerning Romanian tailing ponds
mentioned in the 1st Regional Inventory is now left out.
This regional inventory
and ranking of accidental risks is based on four national risk evaluations,
which in fact give extremely brief information on the kind of risk on each
site, which are difficult to judge, especially at an international scale of
comparison. However, the list provides the first-ever regional overview of
the most risky industrial sites for all four Tisa river basin countries.
Methodology of the Regional Inventory
Based on the national information provided, three categories were chosen for the Tisa Regional Inventory:
+ High risk spots: The country information indicates directly or indirectly a high
accident risk (existing leakage etc.): Only these spots are indicated below and were
chosen for the regional map (attached)!
+ Lower risk spots: The information provided to ICPDR states a certain risk, or it is
incomplete (i.e. it does not exclude a potential "risk"): e.g. medium or low risk,
storage of large quantities (> 1,000 t) of hazardous substances etc. These spots are
given in the tables below.
+ Other spots: The country information provided does not indicate a major accident
risk of environmental pollution. These spots are only listed in the national reports
but not in this regional inventory.
Note to the numbering of ARS spots:
The numbers given in the
present document refer first to the new ARS map number and then to those numbers
given in the national inventories (attention: these numbers are not in one
order, there are cases where e.g. number 1 is given twice within one national
inventory). This reference will facilitate a comparison of the present evaluation
with the national source documents.
2. Evaluation of documents provided by the four governments
2.1. Romania
43 spots storing potentially polluting substances were indicated by the Romanian Ministry for Waters, Forests and Environmental Protection. The regional assessment led to the following classification:
24 high risk spots:
+ 19 mining spots (16 tailing deposits/ponds, 3 mines)
+ 1 metal smelting plant
+ 1 pharmaceutical plant
+ 1 pulp & paper plant
+ 1 pig farm with risky biological ponds
+ 1 chemical industry (pond)
1.
SC TERAPIA SA
2.
SC AURUL SA (pond)
3.
SM BORSA - Colbu Pond
4.
SM BORSA - Novat Pond
5.
SM BAIA MARE UP Central Flotation Unit, UP Sasar (pond)
6.
SC ALLIED DEALS PHOENIX SA
7.
SM BAIA MARE - EM Baia Sprie (pond)
8.
SM BAIA MARE - EM Cavnic (pond)
9.
EM AURUM - Ilba Sector
10.
SM BAIA MARE - EM Herja
11.
CMNPN REMIN BAIA MARE - EM Turt (pond)
12.
EM AURUM - Nistru Section
13.C.N.M.P.N.
REMIN SA BAIA MARE Mining Subsidiary Rodna (pond)
14.
SM BAIA MARE - EM Baiut (pond)
15.
SC SOMES SA, Dej
16.
SC COMINEX NEMETALIFERE SA - Mining Subsidiary Aghires (ponds)
17.
SC AGROCOMSUIN - SA BONTIDA (biological ponds)
2.CNCAF
Minvest, SC Devamin SA, Branch Mine Brad - U P Gurabarza, Râbita Pond
4.CNCAF
Minvest, SC Devamin SA, Branch Mine B?ita - U P B?ita, Fânate Pond
2.
SC BICAPA SA (pond)
4.
E.M. ABRUD (pond)
5.
EM Rouia Montana (pond)
7.
EM Baia de Aries (pond)
10.
EM Coranda Certej (pond)
19 other industries appear to have a lower risk level:
+ 6 mining spots (5 tailing deposits/ponds, 1 mines)
+ 2 chemical industry plants
+ 4 oil production & processing plants
+ 1 sugar factory (operations halted in 2000!)
+ 3 pig farms
+ 1 chicken farm pit
+ 1 fertiliser plant
+ 1 municipal sewage station
18.
SC ZAHARUL SA
19.
SC NUTRISAM SA SATU MARE Hogs farm Moftin
1.CNCAF
Minvest, SC Devamin SA, Branch Mine Brad -Sector Mine Barza
3.CNCAF
Minvest, SC Devamin SA EM. Brusturi - U P Luncsoara (pond)
5.
SC Bauxita Min SA, Dobresti Pond I
6.
SC Nutrientul SA Ciumeghiu Farm
7.
R.A. Apaterm, Cleaning station and biological ponds
8.
SC Sinteza SA, Liquid storage
9.
SC Suinprod SA, Biological ponds
10.
SN Petrom SA, Branch Suplacu de Barc?u - Oil field
11.
SN Petrom SA, Branch Suplacu de Barc?u - Oil field and Gas Marghita
12.
SC Petrolsub SA
13.
SC Petrol Derna SA
1.
SC AZOMURES SA - pond
3.
SC UPSOM SA - pond
6.
E.M. Iara - pond
8.
EM Zlatna - pond
9.
EM Deva - pond
11.
SC SUINTEST SA Gorneati - biological ponds
The complete information about these ARS is given in chapter 3.
2.2. Ukraine
19 spots of potentially polluting sources were indicated by the government, with the numbers 1 to 8 to still be checked again by ministry experts. In the inventory, the WGK values have still to be added. In the regional assessment, for the time being, all spots were included with the following classification:
6 high risk spots
+ 3 pulp & paper plants
+ 2 oil pipelines
+ 1 oil treatment plant
1.
Opened joint-stock company "Perechynskyi chemical timber industrial
complex", State
2.
Opened joint-stock company "Svalyava chemical timber industry complex",
State
3.
Opened joint-stock company "Velykobychkivsky chemical timber industrial
complex", State
6.
"Prykarpattrans oilproduct", Russian Federation
19.
Platform 2/1 village Rososh, "Prykarpattrans naftoproduct",
Russian Federation
13 other industries appear to have lower risk level:
+ 1 ore tailings dam from the metallurgical industry
+ 2 oil stocking companies
+ 10 municipal wastewater
treatment plants.
4.
Fuel depot, "Nafroservice" company, State
5.
Opened joint-stock company "Zakarpatyanaftoproduct- Chust",
State
8.
Zakarpatskyi polymetallic industrial complex, State
9.
Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Uzhgorod,
State
10.
Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Mukachevo
, State
11.
Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Chust, State
12.
Rayon Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Svalyava,
State
13.
Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Beregovo,
State
14.
Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Vynogradovo,
State
15.
Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Chop, State
16.
Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Solotvyno,
State
17.
Industrial management of water-supply and sewerage company of Tyachiv,
State
18.
Opened joint-stock company "Rachivska cardboard factory", State
The complete information about these ARS is given in chapter 3.
2.3. Slovakia
16 spots of potentially polluting sources were indicated by the government. 12 were evaluated as having regional risk importance. These are:
1 high risk spot
+ mining industry
12.
elba .p. 02 Siderit, Roava
11 lower risk spots:
+ 4 mining and related industry
+ 1 machinery industry
+ 3 chemical industries
+ 1 metallurgy industry
+ 1 energy production
+ 1 pulp & paper industry
1.
FINI Spiská Nová Ves
3.
Kovohuty - úpravna Slovinky
5.
VS Ferroenergy Koice
7.
Chemko Stráske, Michalovce
8.
SE a.s. EVO Vojany, Michalovce
9.
SWS Vojany, Bardejov
10.
Tesla Stropkov, Bardejov
11.
Bukocel Hencovce, Vranov nad Toplou
13.
Magnetech Slovakia a.s., Hnúta, Rimavska S.
14.
Slovmag a.s. Lubeník, Revuca
15.
SMZ Jelava, Revuca
The complete information about these ARS is given in chapter 3.
2.4. Hungary
The government has provided a package of 447 spots of potentially polluting sources, compiled by the 7 environment inspectorates (EI) in the Tisza catchment. The Environment Management Institute from Budapest then evaluated the survey and reduced the site number to 261, many of which were attributed to the hazard category III. Only 10 of all evaluated polluting sources belong to the mining sector: The report states that, except for three less relevant sites, there is no metal mine or processing of dead rocks, neither sludge deposit from metal processing nor mine water treatment in the Hungarian Tisza catchment. However, there are some deposits from "drilling-lubricating sludge" (exploration of hydrocarbons).
The comments given in column 10 of the Szolnok Inspectorate are partly abbreviations which were not explained; they still have to be checked!
In the inventory, the most risky spots seem to be:
11 high risk spots
+ 1 landfill with radioactive waste (Budapest Inspectorate)
+ 1 deposit with several mio. tons of slag and flying ash ( " )
+ 1 pond (flood hazard) of a sugar factory (Szolnok Inspector.)
+ 1 gasoline tank deposit ( " )
+ 1 complex of reservoirs with mine and industrial metal sludge (Miskolc Inspectorate)
+ 1 big reservoir of power plant slag and slurry ( " )
+ 4 oil storage installations ( " )
+ 1 power plant complex with big slurry and slag deposits ( " )
4.
Landfill for radioactive wastes Püspökszilágy
6.
HUNVIRON Kft. Pile from flying ashes, L?rinci
1.
Sugar factory Rt. Begin-Say (French)
3.
MOL Rt., Szajol Bázistelep
22.
HIDROTECH Bányászati- és Környezetvédelmi Kft., ÁPV Rt, Gyöngyösoroszi
30.
AES Borsodi Energetikai Kft. Power Plant, AES Summit Generation Ltd.,
Kazincbarcika
78.
Kolajtároló Rt., Tiszaújváros MOL Rt. Tiszai Finomító
79.
Terméktároló Rt., Tiszaújváros MOL Rt. Tiszai Finomító
81.
Columbian Tiszai Koromgyártó KFT, Columbian Chemical Company USA , Tiszaújváros
82.
AES Tisza ereme KFT, AES SUMMIT Generation Ltd., Tiszaújváros
83.
AES Borsodi Energetikai KFT Tiszapalkonyai Hue-reme, AES Áramtermele Holding,
Tiszaújváros
54 other industries appear to have a lower risk level:
+ 1 landfill with hazardous waste (categ. I-II) (Budap. Inspect.)
+ 1 oily waste deposit ( " )
+ 1 mining tank car (Szeged Inspectorate)
+ 5 sludge piles from drilling with sodium-dichromate ( " )
+ 1 pig farm manure reservoir (Szolnok Inspectorate)
+ 7 storages of various chemicals for manufacturing ( " )
+ 1 fertiliser plant (")
+ 3 machinery industries (")
+ 3 gasoline tank deposits ( " )
+ 2 chemical deposit from pharmaceutics (Debrecen Inspect.)
+ 5 large reservoirs from food industry ( " )
+ 1 big mining deposit from drilling with potassium-humate (")
+ 2 reservoirs of pig farms ( " )
+ 9 deposits from pharma, machinery & energy/oil industries (")
+ 1 hazardous waste deposit ( " )
+ 1 fertiliser plant ( " )
+ 1 oil disposal site (Gyula Inspectorate)
+ 1 reservoir of oily sludge (Miskolc Inspectorate)
+ 2 municipal waste deposits ( " )
+ 1 sludge pond of an abandoned mine ( " )
+ 1 disposal site for hazardous waste ( " )
+ 1 sugar wastewater basin ( " )
+ 1 olefin production (several tanks with chemicals, wastewater basin) ( " )
+ 1 chemical plant with various storing tanks ( " )
+ 1 oil refinery (storage tanks) ( " )
+ 1 hazardous waste combustion site ( " )
+ 1 complex of 4 railway re-loading stations for chemicals (Nyiregyhaza Inspectorate)
+ 1 hazardous waste storage facility ( " )
The complete information about these
ARS is given in chapter 3.
5.Pyrus-Rumpold
Rt. Landfill for hazardous wastes, Aszód-Galgamácsa
11.TERRAVITA
Kft., Hatvan
42.
MOL Rt. Kut. Term. Ág. Kutatás-1 Iroda, Algyö
57.
ROTARY Fúrási Kft., Zsana
58.
Köolajkutató Rt., Algyö
59.
Köolajkutató Rt., Cserebökeny
60.
Köolajkutató Rt., Kiszombor
61.
Köolajkutató Rt., Ruzsa
2.
META Kft. Abádszalók
1.
Elektrolux Lehel Kft. Svéd property Jászberény
2.
TVM Rt. Szolnok
3.
Gyógyászati Segédeszközök Gyára Kisújszállás
6.
PANNÓNIA Rt. Kunszent-márton
8.
Holland Colors Kft. Dutch property Szolnok
9.
Mol Rt. Szajoli basic site Szajol
10.
Saltis Kft. Italian property Martfö
11.
Metallo-globus Rt. Tarnaszentmiklós
12.
CLAAS Hungária Kft. German property Törökszentmiklós
14.
Fémfel-dolgozó Rt. Mezötúr
25.
Terszol Szövetkezet Szolnok
31.
Jász-Plasztik Kft. Jászberény
1.
KUN-REHAB Kft. Kenderes
2.
Magyar Honvédség Szolnok Repülötér
2.
ICN Magyarország Kft. Tiszavasvári
3.
Hortobágyi Vágóhíd Kft. Hortobágy
4.
BIG-COMPANY Kft. Balmazújváros-Telekföld
5.
MB Köolajkutató Rt. Suburb of Berettyóújfalu site N: 0772
9.
Sugar Factory Co. in Kaba
11.
NAGISZ Rt. Hegedöslóré site of pig husbandry Nádudvar
12.
Hajdúsági Agráripari Rt. site of pig husbandry Hajdúszoboszló
15.
Nagisz Rt. Factory of Milk and Ice-cream Nádudvar
16.
NAGISZ Rt. Slaughterhouse and Meat factory Nádudvar
17.
BIOGAL Pharmaceutical Factory Co. Debrecen
18.
DAEWOO MGM Rt. Debrecen
19.
TITÁSZ Rt. Debreceni Power Plant Ltd. Debrecen
20.
Dispomedicor Rt. Debrecen
22.
GE HUNGARY Rt. Hajdúböszörmény Kinizsi tér 1.
24.
HAJDUKOMM Kft. Balmazújváros-László-háza
25.
Hajdúsági Agráripari Rt. (Agrochemical Factory) Nádudvar
26.
HTTV Ltd. Berettyóujfalu
29.
Hajdú-Berstal Kft. Berettyóújfalu
31.
MOL Rt. BFL Logisztika Ebes
32.
MOL Rt. Nagyhegyes
33.
MÁVFAVÉD Ltd. Püspökladány
5.
Körös-Kör Kft. Ecsegfalva
11.
TERRA-VITA Kft., Eger
27.
Kazincbarcika Múcsonyi út municipal solid waste landfill ÉHG. Rt. Kazincbarcika
34.
Miskolc-Nádasrét municipal landfill for solid wastes REM Kft., Miskolc
57.
Recski Ércbányák Rt., Recsk
62.
Sajókaza-Határvölgy landfill for hazardous waste of category III
72.
Szerencsi Cukorgyár Rt Szerencs
75.
Tiszai Vegyi Kombinát Rt., Tiszaújváros
76.
Akzo Nobel Festékgyártó és Kereskedelmi Rt.
Tiszaújváros
77.
MOL Rt. Tiszai Finomító, Tiszaújváros
80.
Ecomissio KFT. Tiszaújváros
3. High and Lower Risk Spots for Pollution Accidents in the Tisa Catchment of Romania, Ukraine and Slovakia
Detailed description of the high and lower risks spots, extracted from the national inventories:
Romania:High and Lower Risk Spots Somes-Tisa?pages 15-17
High Risk Spots Crisuri-Mures page 18
Ukraine:High Risk Spots pages 19-20
Slovakia: High Risk Spot page 21
Lower Risk Spots page 21 (excerpt!)
Hungary: High Risk Spots pages 22-25
Almost all Lower Risk Spots are not shown here in the www version!
ROMANIA - High Risk Spots in the Somes-Tisa Sub-basin
Owner
length (km)
properties WGK
Somes (244)
Somes (95)
cianuration
- spills, dam's cracks,
transport pipes breakdown
Colbu Pond
Viseu (63) Tisa (59)
for the precip. 9.000
m3
-spills, dam's cracks
and transport pipes breakdown
Novat Pond
Vaser (12) Viseu (41) Tisa (59)
- spills, dam's
cracks
Somes (95)
heavy metals (Pb,
Zn, Cu, Mn)
takeover volume for the precip. 120.000
m3
-spills, dam's cracks,
transport pipes breakdown
Lapus (6) Somes (95)
silt pond - 2.600 m3
20%
EM Baia Sprie
Lapus (6) Somes (95)
for the precip. 30.000
m3
- spills, dam's cracks,
transport pipes breakdown
EM Cavnic
Lapus (37,7) Somes (95)
for the precip. 12.000
m3
- spills, dam's cracks,
transport pipes breakdown
Somes (84,5)
-mine waters -unproper purification
EM Herja
Sasar (14) Lapus (6) Somes (95)
-reduced and unproper
purification
EM Turt
Satu Mare
Tur (68) Tisa (820)
R54-58
- processing plant
in construction
Baita (12) Lapus (2) Somes (95)
-reduced and unproper
purification
- breakdown of the
silt # water transport pipes at Bozanta pond
Mining Subsidiary
Rodna
Bistrita Nasaud
(560)
(Pb, Zn) Storage of the slag
(Pb, Zn)
2.737.930 stored quantity,
until #720 m quota
and aditional toe
dam
- stability coefficient
1,4 - wide general angle
of the slope 34 - leaches over the
main dam, in case of malfunc-tion of the water evacua-tion system
EM Baiut
Somes (95)
takeover volume for the precip. 25.000
m3
- spills, dam's cracks,
transport pipes breakdown
Somesul Mic (82) Somes (244)
mining
- instant power breakdown - breaking of the
effluent pipe, which evacuates the residual waters from the pond
SA BONTIDA
Somes (244)
substances, amonium,
suspensions
1.
SC TERAPIA SA
Cluj-Napoca/
Cluj
Drugs
production
cyanide
waters storage in 3 local stations - 20 cm/day
3
decianuration
3
reserve tanks - 20 cm/day
-accidental
leaches of cyanide waters over the platform
2.
SC AURUL SA
Baia
Mare/ Maramures
Lapus
(5,2)
Precious
metal mining and processing /
cyanide,
heavy metals (Pb, Zn, Cu, Mn)
2.400.000
flatland
pond; slag made dam
84%-preci-
pitation take-over volume 85.000 m3
-increased
risk for cyanides and heavy metal ions
3.
SM BORSA
Baia
Borsa / Maramures
Nonferrous
ores mining and processing / flotation procedures
flatland
pond; slag made dam
15%takeover
volume
-
high risk for heavy metals
4.
SM BORSA
Baia
Borsa/ Maramures
Nonferrous
ores mining and processing / flotation procedures
flatland
pond; slag made dam
92,5%
take-over volume for precip. to be established after activity resuming
-
high risk for heavy metals
5.
SM BAIA MARE UP Central Flotation Unit, UP Sasar
Baia
Mare/ Maramures
Nonferrous
ores processing / flotation procedures
cyanide,
flatland
pond; slag made dam
-
medium risk for cyanide and heavy metals
6.
SC ALLIED DEALS PHOENIX SA
Baia
Mare / Maramures
Nonferrous
smelting, reactives producetion
heavy
metals, sulphuric acid
-
medium risk for H2SO4
7.
SM BAIA MARE
Baia
Sprie/ Maramures
Nonferrous
ores mining and processing / flotation procedures
flatland
pond; slag made dam
-
medium risk for heavy metals ion pollution
8.
SM BAIA MARE
Cavnic
/ Maramures
Nonferrous
ores mining and processing / flotation procedures
flatland
pond; slag made dam
-
medium risk for heavy metals ion pollution
9.
EM AURUM,
Ilba SectorBaia
Mare (Ilba) / Maramures
Nonferrous
ores processing
heavy
metals from mine waters
-intermediary
storage for packed silt
-
medium risk for heavy metals ions pollution
10.
SM BAIA MARE
Baia
Mare/ Maramures
Nonferrous
ores mining
-mine
waters
- medium
risk for heavy metals ions pollution
11.
CMNPN REMIN BAIA MARE
Turt
/
Complex
nonferrous ores mining without processing
heavy
metals (Cu, Pb, Zn)
2,2
milions m3
-
stalling pond not operating
12.
EM AURUM
Nistru SectionBaia
Mare (Nistru) / Maramures
Nonferrous
ores processing
heavy
metals from mine waters
-mine
waters
-
medium risk for heavy metals ions pollution
13.C.N.M.P.N.
REMIN SA BAIA MARE
Rodna
/
6.300.000
slag (at final quota #740)
Stalling
pond: valley - type pond, with main dam built on slag
-
medium risk level
14.
SM BAIA MARE
Baiut
/ Maramures
Nonferrous
ores mining and processing / flotation procedures
flatland
pond; slag made dam
-
medium risk for heavy metals ions pollution
15.
SC SOMES SA
Dej
/ Cluj
Pulp
and paper prcessing
silt
storage
16.
SC COMINEX NEMETALIFERE SA Mining Subsidiary Aghires
Aghires
/ Cluj
Caolin
sands and metalurgic sands
3
stalling ponds
-
floods, landslides, dam's cracks
17.
SC AGROCOMSUIN
Bontida
/ Cluj
Hogs
farm
4
biologic ponds
-
exfiltrations or cracks at the biologic ponds
ROMANIA - Lower Risk Spots in the Somes-Tisa Sub-basin
Satu Mare
Crasna (53) Tisa (820)
Hogs farm Moftin
Tisa (820)
18.
SC ZAHARUL SA
Carei
/
Sugar
processing from sugar beetle by diffusion technology
oxygen
consummer substances, suspensions (CCOCr)
120.000
m3
-
operations halted (since 2000) for a undetermined period
19.
SC NUTRISAM SA SATU MARE
Moftin
/ Satu Mare
Intensive
livestock rising - hogs
oxygen
consummer substances, suspensions (CCOCr) fenols
6.000
m3
-
biologic pond used only in case of maintenance or revision procedures at
the epuration installation
ROMANIA - High Risk Spots in the Crisuri and Mures Sub-basins
CRISURI HYDROGRAPHIC SUB-BASIN
Owner
district
Water-course length (km)
used
substances
properties WGK
(%)
SC Devamin SA Branch Mine Brad - U P Gurabarza Pond Râbita
Hunedoara
(41,5)
flotation procedures
heavy metals (Pb, Zn, Cu,Mn)
10 000 000 m?
- spills, dam cracks,
trans-port pipes break-down
SC Devamin SA Branch Mine B?ita - U P B?ita Fânate Pond
Bihor
Flotat. procedures
heavy metals (Cu, Zn,Pb)
3 010 000 m?
- spills, dam cracks,
transport pipes break-down
2.CNCAF
Minvest
Crisul
Alb
Copper
and gold ore processing /
cyanide,
R 50-53
8 700
000 m?
Slope
pond, sterile dike
13 %
-
medium risk for cyanides and heavy metal ion pollution
4.CNCAF
Minvest
Crisul
B?ita (13), Crisului Negru (27)
Non-ferrous
ore mining and processing/
cyanide,
R 50-53
2 553
000 m?
slope
pond, sterile dike
15 %
-
medium risk for cyanides and heavy metal ion pollution
MURES HYDROGRAPHIC SUB-BASIN
Mures
- Cr6+
Alba
Aries (66)
-suspensions - acid solutions
Rock made dam;
- low effic. of flatland
Alba
Abrud (17) Aries (49)
- acid solutions - suspensions
Storage 6.666.700 m3
Slag and rock made dam; mine waters
- acid mine waters
Alba
V.Sart (5) Aries (74)
- cyanides - suspensions
Storage 1.400.000
t
slag made dam; mine waters
Hunedoara
Mures (484)
- suspensions
Slag made dam
2.
SC BICAPA SA
Târnaveni
Târnava
Micö (136)
Production
of anorganics
- cyanide
R50
- 53
Storage
1.000.000 t
Silt
storage; flatland pond
-
high risk of contamination with cyanide and Cr6+
4.
E.M. ABRUD
Abrud
V. Sesei
(2)
Nonferrous
(Cu) ore mining and processing
- heavy
metals
R50-
53
27.568.410
tons
Flatland
pond;
74 %
-
high risk for heavy metal;
5.
EM Rojia Montan
Roia
Montana
V. Sölitei
(22)
Nonferrous
(Au) ore mining and processing
- heavy
metals
R50
- 53
407.000
t/year
Flatland
pond ;
35 %
-
high risk for heavy metal pollution;
7.
EM Baia de Aries
Baia
de Aries
V. Cuii
(1)
Complex
non-ferrous ore mining processing; flotation procedures
- heavy
metals
R50
- 53
436.000
t/year
Flatland
pond
66 %
-
high risk for heavy metal and cyanide pollution
10.
EM Coranda Certej
Certej
Certej
(16)
Nonferrous
ore mining
- heavy
metals
R50
- 53
Storage
8.000.000 t
Flatland
pond;
4.800.000
t
-
high risk for heavy metal pollution ;
UKRAINE: High Risk Spots
Inventory of the potential pollution sources (Ukraine)
owner
district
type of production
processes
(WGK values)
State
Uzh (0,3)
State
115
State
Tisza (0,5)
State
Latorytsya
product", Russian Federation
Accidental discharge of non
treated wastes
Opened
joint-stock company "Perechynskyi chemical timber industrial complex",
town
Perechyn
Chemical
timber processing, charcoal production
Medium
(spillage from the tanks)
Opened
joint-stock company "Svalyava chemical timber industry complex"
metal
tanks
High
(spillage from the tanks)
Opened
joint-stock company "Velykobychkivsky chemical timber industrial
complex",
High
(spillage from the tanks due to corrosion)
"Prykarpattransoilproduct",
Russian Federation
High.
Pipe-lines burst, oil spillage
"Druzhba"
High.
Pipe-lines burst, oil spillage
Platform
2/1 village Rososh, "Prykarpattransnafto-
Medium,
UKRAINE - Lower Risk Spots
State
Perechynskyi rayon
Uzh (5)
State
0,3
products
State
10
96,000 m3
Dam break or over-spillage
of non-treated wastes
Fuel
depot, "Nafroservice" company,
Low
Opened
joint-stock company "Zakarpatyanaftoproduct-Chust",
Low
Zakarpatskyi
polymetallic industrial complex,
Low
Slovakia: High Risk Spot
(type of production,
chemical substances
elba
.p. 02 Siderit
Ronava
Slaná
(66,4 ) *
Siderite
mining
As
0,144%
3
984 911 m3
3
sludge-
heavy
metals
Niná
Slaná
and
processing
Pb
0,009%
silted
sludge
2
drying
bed
are
bound
Zn
0,004%
1
to
the sludge
in
sludge
Slovakia: Lower Risk Spots
(type of production, used technology)
FINI
Spiská Nová
Spiská
Nová Ves
Hornád
(130 ) *
Synthetic
and cotton
Ves
material
production
elba
Rudnany
Koice
-
Rudniansky
creek
Mining
and processing
oils
and fats
21,62
t
reservoir
surroundings
(0,6)
of
baryte ore
H2SO4
41,77
t
reservoir
Hornád
(121,5) *
oleic
acid
50,24
t
reservoir
polyethylene
glycol
4,75
t
reservoir
NaOH
4,15
t
reservoir
praestol
0,55
t
reservoir
hexametaphosphate
4,1
t
reservoir
Sludge
with heavy metals
reservoir
Kovohuty
- úpravna
Spiská
Nová Ves
Slovinský
p. (5,5 )
raw
ore processing
Slovinky
Hornád
(98,8) *
no
registrated resource
Hungary: High Risk Spots
(km)
R VALUES,
WGK hazard categories
Regional Environmental Inspectorate, Budapest
Püspökszi-lágy
SZILÁGY
BROOK (Galga 29,8) ((Zagyva 91,3)) (((Tisza 335,5)))
Disposal
of radioactive wastes
no
storage of chemicals
in
a scale of 1000 tons
SPECIAL
DEPOSITS AND TANKS
Licensed
landfill posing hazard in case of emergency
L?rinci
Zagyva
110,0 (Tisza 335,5)
In
the area of the flying ash pile of the Lorinci Power Plant besides the waste
from the Plant there are different waste of III hazard category
no
storage of chemicals
Several
million tons of slag and flying ash
DEPOSIT
It
may pose risk in case of disaster
Közép-Tisza vidéki Regional Environmental Inspectorate, Szolnok
Rt. Begin-Say French proprietor
X: 200 Y: 735
storage of industrial waste
water
Bázistelep X: 201 000 Y:744 500
Tisza (337+200 km)
Sugar
factory
Szolnok
Tisza
(332)
production,
of sugar
Waste
water from sugar production with organic nitrogen content
Depositor
of reinforced concrete inside the factory, reservoirs made of earth in flood
zone
20 %
P1
High risk due to conditions of the dams of the reservoirs located in
flood zone of the Tisza
MOL
Rt.
Szajol
Alcsi
Holt-Tisza (10 km)
Storage
and trade of crude oil products
gasoline,
petrol, motor oils
550E
m3 storing capacity
Tanks
above and below the surface
P1
Risk due to receiver in vicinity & to capacity
Regional Environmental Inspectorate Miskolc
Proprietor: AES Áram-termelő
Hol
22.
HIDROTECH
Bányászati- és Környezetvédelmi Kft.
Proprietor:
ÁPV RtGyöngyösoro-szi
Toka
5
Gyöngyös 23,1
Tarna 12,8
Zagyva 59,2
Tisza 395,6Treatment
of water from the mine, activity from liquidation
metal
sludge
(Fe, Mn, Zn, Cd, As, Pb)22,
23, 51
2
167.884
m3
Reservoir
for slurry in Bence-völgyi
(300.000 m3)
X: 280.800
Y: 711.800kb.
50
No
direct risk to the river Tisza.
Valley is closed with dead rock from the mine. No proper tech-nical protection,
improvement under preparation
Water
from the with high metal content (3500m3/day)
1
10.510
m3
9400
m3 and
6110 m3 capacity depositing basins made of dead rock X: 280.600
Y: 711.50010
No
direct risk to the river Tisza.
Reservoir made of dead rock from mine. No proper technical protection, im-provement
un-der preparation against leakage
Reservoir
for industrial water and sludge with heavy metal content: Fe, Mn, Zn, Cd,
As, Pb)
1
200-
280.000 m3 water and 100-120.000 m3 sludge with heavy
metals
300.000
m3 reservoir in closed valley
X: 278.000
Y: 712.00010
No
direct risk to the river Tisza.
1/3 part of the reservoir is mud High metal content.
30.
AES
Borsodi Energetikai Kft. Borsodi Power Plant
Proprietor:
AES SUMMIT GENERATION Ltd.Kazincbarcika
Sajó
85
Tisza 492Power
Plant electric energy and heat operated with coal
Reservoir
for slag and slurry with metal content /Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb, V/ and As
1
17
400 000 t
Slurry
cassettes without technical protection
0
No
direct risk to the river Tisza.
Average metal content of the slurry: 100-150 mg/kg, average arsenic content
176 mg/kg
Light
heating oil
10,
40
2
175
t
Tank
of steel above surface
5
Transformer
oil /no PCB content/
10,
40, 45
2
212
t
Open
air transformers
100
All
transformer provi-ded with concrete base
s-Szuha
4,8
Sajó 76,1
Tisza 492Water
discharge from the Power Plant
Rainfall
from the slurry site and the boilers
0
0
1900
m3/day
Drained
in a circling ditch made of earth
The
amount of hazardous sub-stances relates to the average quantity of discharged
water
78.
Kőolajtároló
Rt.
Tiszaújváros
MOL Rt. Tiszai Finomító
Tisza
483+600
Storage
Crude
oil
11,
45
2
136.000
Metal
tank above the surface
0
Risk
to Tisza, classification is necessary. Basin with metal circle
79.
Terméktároló
Rt.
Tiszaújváros
MOL Rt. Tiszai Finomító
Tisza
483+600
Storage
Petrol
11
2
92.000
Metal
tank above the surface
4
Risk
to Tisza, classification is necessary. Basin with metal circle.
Gasoline
10,
20 - 21, 402
100.000
Metal
tank above the surface
0
Basin
with metal circle.
81.
Columbian
Tiszai Koromgyártó KFT
Proprietor:
Columbian Chemikal Company USA Tiszaújváros
Tisza
484
Production
industrial soot of oil
oil
10,
40, 45
2
5200
Tank
above the surface
50
Risk
to Tisza, classification is necessary Placed in basin
82.
AES
Tisza erőmű KFT
Proprietor:
AES SUMMIT Generation Ltd.
Tiszaújváros
Tisza
490
Production
of electric energy, gas fuelled power plant
Turbine
oil
10,
45
2
141
Tank
above surface and in oil-cooling system in the technology
10
Risk
to Tisza, classification is necessary Reinforced basin
Transformer
oil
10,
45
2
274
In
transfor-mers & barrel
0
heating
oil
10,
45
2
105,3
In
the system
0
Treatment
of waste water (municipal & industrial)
Organic
material, oil
1
474
m3
Reinforced
basin
10
Heavy
metals
1
400
m3
Tiszaújváros
heating
oil
10,
45
2
260,000
Tank
above the surface
50
Basin
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6a
6b
7
8
9
10.
83.
AES
Borsodi Energetikai KFT Tiszapalkonyai Hőeőerőmű
Tiszaújváros
Tisza
483
Production
of electric energy and heat
50
Potential
risk to the Tisza, classification is necessary. Reinforced basin
Transformer
oil
10,
45
2
242
waste
water treatment
Organic
material
1
170
m3
Reinforced
concrete basin
15
Slurry
water
1
800,000
m3
Slurry
site
5
Without
techni-cal protection, made of clay produced at site
Slag,
flying ash
1
14,000,000
The details for almost
all Lower Hot Spots of the Tisa region are not shown
in the www version of this document. For the complete list of all Lower Hot
Spots please contact our office!